1-800-669-6820 (TTY)
USPS has joined more than 1,500 companies using The Work Number, an automated service that allows you to quickly and securely provide proof of your employment or income. The complainant worked at the United States Postal Service (USPS). (This article first appeared in the January/February 2021 issue of the American Postal Worker magazine) On December 1, 2020, Arbitrator Sharnoff issued a decision confirming Clerk Craft jurisdiction over operation of the Small Parcel Sorting System. Darin B. v. Office of Personnel Management, EEOC Appeal No.
0120131989 (Oct. 26, 2016), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120131989.txt. Bernardo C. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. Particularly useful are their publications "Questions and Answers About . Postal Service who was subjected to a hostile work environment for over three years and then removed.
EEOC Administrative Judge has approved a settlement in the Pittman v According to the USPS' own written policy, "managers and supervisors are responsible for preventing harassment and inappropriate behavior could lead to illegal harassment and must respond. information only on official, secure websites. 2021001103 (Feb. 24, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_06_08/2021001103.pdf. Speaking of Special Interest Groups it is pathetic. She further alleged the USPS retaliated against her for prior EEO action from 2005-2006. 0120161608 (July 17, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120161608.txt. Neither did the unions make any effort to unite USPS workers with their class brothers and sisters across the border during the 2018 strike of 50,000 Canadian postal workers, who were also fighting against a brutal profit-driven work regimen where real wages had fallen and understaffing led to speedup and heavy workloads that caused an accident rate among postal workers to be five times that of the average rate for federally regulated industries. Here are answers to some questions that have been presented by a number of the class members: What if I move or change my contact information? Moreover, some EEO complaints dated back as far as 2001. The Agency provided insufficient evidence to support its dismissal of a complaint, on the basis that Complainant was not an Agency employee, where the record that the Agency submitted contained only the EEO Counselor's Report, the Notice of Right to File a Discrimination Complaint, and the formal complaint; the Agency did not provide any contracts or affidavits from management officials regarding the day-to-day responsibilities and management of Complainant's position. 1-844-234-5122 (ASL Video Phone), Call 1-800-669-4000
Agency violated the Rehabilitation Act when, after Complainant's physician provided a medical report stating that Complainant's borderline Type II Diabetes Mellitus did not require medication and did not impair his ability to do his job as a Court Security Officer, Agency requested at least 11 additional types of medical information and examinations; a mere diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus does not automatically mean that an agency has a job-related, business-necessity-based reason for subjecting CSOs to disability-related inquiries and medical examinations. Washington, DC 20507
26, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120172637.pdf. Of the 5,659 complaints filed at USPS, 1,283 contained allegations of race (Black/African American) discrimination, 570 contained allegations of race (White) discrimination, 128 contained allegations of race (Asian) discrimination, 17 contained allegations of race (American Indian/Alaska Native) discrimination, 757 contained allegations of color discrimination and 2,533 contained allegations of disability discrimination.
EEOC: McConnell v. USPS - Final Agency Decision Vacated 0720180015 (Nov. 15, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720180015.pdf. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 2020002713 (June 16, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_01_19/2020002713.pdf. 0120162182 (Dec. 8, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162182.txt. A real socialist and internationalist strategy is needed to take control of communications infrastructure from the corporate ruling class and to place it into the hands of the working class worldwide.
The four unions which officially represent the postal workersthe American Postal Workers Union, National Association of Letter Carriers, National Postal Mail Handlers Union and National Rural Letter Carriers Associationhave not lifted a finger to mobilize workers to oppose these attacks, including the loss of over 250,000 post office jobs since 1999an almost 28 percent reduction in its workforce. Find your nearest EEOC office
The Agency articulated a legitimate reason for disciplining Complainant, but it did not explain why other employees who engaged in similar behavior were not disciplined. Agency properly dismissed complaint as untimely filed where Agency notified Complainant of applicable filing deadline and proper address to file her complaint with the Agency but Complainant nonetheless sent the complaint to the EEOC's Office of Federal Operations. First time EEO efile user? This booklet also provides an explanation of the REDRESS program REDRESS, an alternative dispute resolution process, may offer you an opportunity to request mediation in addition to traditional EEO The final ruling from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission came more than 10 years after a former employee first filed a class complaint alleging USPS subjected employees to a "pattern. Substantial evidence supported Administrative Judge's finding that Agency discriminated against Complainant on the bases of race (African American) and sex (male) when it terminated his employment for alleged insubordination and misconduct; AJ found that evidence substantiated Complainant's perception that supervisor regarded him as a "big, Black man" and racially stereotyped his behavior as aggressive and intimidating.
PDF U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal - USPS Velva B. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. According to the nonprofit organization ProPublica the EEOC ruled that the NRP illegally discriminated against injured workers by creating a hostile work environment, taking away disability accommodations and revealing workers confidential medical information in 2015 and 2017.
Injury Compensation (OWCP) | American Postal Workers Union The Postal Service and Postal Inspection Service appropriately addressed all workplace violence cases in the six selected districts reviewed. When a case is dismissed with prejudice in federal court, a complainant may not re-enter the administrative complaint process. Lara G. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. Published: July 20, 2016. In these districts, the Postal Inspection Service investigated 145 . 0120182095 (June 23, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/0120182095.pdf. Mac O. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. * EEOC revised the formula for calculating the ADR offer and participation rates in FY 2006. Expecting every potential class member to undertake the individualized inquiry that the Rehabilitation Act requires during the liability phase is impractical and unworkable; it is more efficient and effective to require prospective class members to prove that they are qualified individuals with disabilities during the remedies phase of the proceeding, because that is where proof of ones status as a qualified individual with a disability under the Rehabilitation Act naturally aligns with proof of ones membership in a class. information only on official, secure websites. If it is found that you meet the legal criteria for reinstatement, the Judge can order USPS to give you back the job you held before the NRP. An official website of the United States government. Alonzo N. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. %PDF-1.6
%
Although Petitioner was entitled to back pay as a component of make-whole relief, she was not entitled to a sum greater than what she would have earned but for her constructive discharge; because her earnings while in active-duty military service between the time of her constructive discharge and her reinstatement exceeded her gross civilian back pay, Petitioner was not entitled to receive back pay. This was met with backlash from the public, and the following year it announced it would instead keep rural post offices open with reduced retail hours, cutting back on labor costs and limiting essential services provided to the millions of people. Iliana S. v. U.S. Sang G. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. 26, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720180009.pdf. In order to have met the federal 2% participation rate goal, 14,158 IWTD were needed. Jess P. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. usps eeoc settlements 2020. boca beacon obituaries. An agency will qualify as a joint employer if it has the right to control the means and manner of the individual's work, regardless of whether the individual is paid by an outside organization or is on the federal payroll. 0120063761 (4/8/08) and ordered the agency to conduct a supplemental investigation on the issue of the complainants entitlement to compensatory damages. michael sandel justice course syllabus. Lacy R. v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. on 8/11/2022 Joint Employers in Permian Basin Retaliated. Felisha A. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. USPS timely processed 99.5% of the 17,054 pre-complaint counselings (without remands) completed in FY 2009. 0720180014 (May 10, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720180014.pdf.
Settlement Agreements for EEO Complaints - Office of Resolution Fiona H. v. Dep't of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. Just 47% of initial appeals before the Merit Systems Protection Boardthe quasi-judicial agency tasked with ensuring agencies follow civil service laws in their disciplinary actions and other . Agency, which conceded that it jointly employed Complainant with his staffing firm, should not have dismissed complaint for failure to state a claim; Agency's contention that it did not know of the alleged harassing behavior of staffing firm employees went to the merits of the complaint, which must be investigated. In either event, the complaint process will be suspended for 90 pending the outcome of the settlement discussions. 0720170019 (Aug. 3, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720170019.txt. 2019004326 (Sept. 30, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2019004326.pdf. After the 1970 postal workers strike against the federal government, the USPS was formed to replace the US Postal Department, which was funded by Congress, with an organization that was run like a business, but which is not a government-owned corporation. The U.S. 1-800-669-6820 (TTY)
The ADUS award was the last in a series of four RI-399 craft jurisdiction awards that (This article first appeared in the November/December issue of the American Postal Worker magazine)