PIs gone AWOL? Is it fair to reject manuscript with few words of comments after long 9 months of review? Answered by Editage Insights
Thus, in rejecting an appeal, we do not intend to imply that our initial decision was flawless, only that the arguments for reconsideration were not sufficiently convincing to exceed the deliberately high threshold for reversing a decision. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader.
Reviews for "Nature Communications" - Page 1 - SciRev All referees agree to Nature's conditions before Nature sends them a manuscript to assess. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. Editors reject manuscripts at this stage for one or more technical reasons: The manuscript is missing essential elements or sections required by the journal. This referees opinion must be satisfied for the manuscript to be published, but as this referee may not know about the field concerned, an endorsement in isolation from the other referee(s) would not constitute grounds for publication. Things just always take much longer than we think they would. Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Deciding when or whether you should write a rebuttal, determining what steps you should take next if you choose the . Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. In [i] we find started associated with past time in [a] but with future time in [b], as indicated by the temporal modifiers yesterday and tomorrow respectively. [1] Sovereignty entails hierarchy within the state, as well as external autonomy for states. Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education.
n - The paper is rejected because the referees have raised considerable technical objections and/or the authors claim has not been adequately established. Even if the reviewers give positive recommendations, the editor can decide to reject a paper. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. 2002 Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data. The criteria for publication of scientific papers (Articles) in Nature are that they: Further editorial criteria may be applicable for different kinds of papers, as follows: Articles published in Nature have an exceptionally wide impact, both among scientists and, frequently, among the general public. In cases where authors opt in to publication of peer reviewer comments and reviewers opt in to being named, we will not link a reviewers name to their report unless they choose to sign their comments to the author with their name.
LetPub - Scientific Journal Selector | Nature Energy 3 weeks is pretty long for this.
How much time does the scientific journal 'Nature' take from - Quora editor decision started nature Usually, the times vary from two to six months, but there is no fixed rule. How long do editor decisions take at Science/Nature? One reason is because each referee sees only a tiny fraction of the papers submitted and is deeply knowledgeable about one field, whereas the editors, who see all the papers submitted, can have a broader perspective and a wider context from which to view the paper.
How, when, and why you should appeal an editor's decision - Cell editor decision started nature rejection - bobmarleypeace.com It is difficult to predict the outcome of the manuscript at this stage, but you can be hopeful. Many submissions are declined without being sent for review. Share your stories!
Journal Said "Major Revisions" Needed? Here's What to Do But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. At some point, they may come back to you and ask you to suggest names (additional names, if you had already given some when you originally submitted the paper). //--> Rejection, organisation and freedom: What it's really like being a Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. The judgement about which papers will interest a broad readership is made by Nature's editors, not its referees. We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. Most papers are sent to two or three referees, but some are sent to more or, occasionally, just to one. A desk-reject means your manuscript has been rejected by a journal without being sent out for review. youre still in the running. What Is the Difference Between 'Man' And 'Son of Man' in Num 23:19? and JavaScript. A decision of major revisions means you'll need to do some heavier work. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Peer review comments, cover letter and more. So dont feel upset! I have also worked as a subject matter expert in the field of Biomedicine. If you receive a revise and resubmit it may take another 24 months to hear back on the revised article. The "Decision Started" status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journal . Nature Neuroscience How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? At times, they may ask you to revise and resubmit the manuscript. It doesnt mean anything other than the editor has started to look at your paper. What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? Later in life this person's emotional feelings about the United States might be challenged if the person reads a critical history. Editors encourage authors in highly technical disciplines to provide a slightly longer summary paragraph that descries clearly the basic background to the work and how the new results have affected the field, in a way that enables nonspecialist readers to understand what is being described. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Many journals now rely on editorial management systems, which are supposed to support the administration and decision making of editors, while aiming at making the process of communication faster and more transparent to both reviewers and authors. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. Overall, it is relatively uncommon for new information to completely change our view of a manuscript, and we ultimately uphold our original decisions in over 90% of cases. Performance & security by Cloudflare. Make sure that your arguments are backed by solid evidence. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. I submitted a manuscript to a Nature journal six days ago. Reviewing excellence - Boer - Creativity and Innovation Management Decision pending means that the decision is pending.They havent decided yet. My thesis aimed to study dynamic agrivoltaic systems, in my case in arboriculture. Editors also strongly encourage authors in appropriate disciplines to include a simple schematic summarizing the main conclusion of the paper, which can be published with the paper as Supplementary Information. if you strongly disagree with the editorial decision, you can appeal against it unless the editor has clearly specified otherwise. How to proceed? Nature editors will normally honour requests that a paper not be sent to one or two (but no more) competing groups for review. Answer (1 of 4): Hi! Of these, about 100 came in as presubmission enquiries by e-mail (for which our median decision turnaround time is 3 days). Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, and our products. Because the 'quality' of a manuscript is not a linear variable, editorial decisions invariably have a subjective component. For those who have contemplated pleading for that precious second chance, we simply don't know where to start.
Plos One What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made This is known as a rescinding. In a competitive world, as Gore Vidal put it, It is not enough to succeed. [CDATA[// >What does "Editor Decision Started" mean? : r/labrats - reddit [CDATA[> In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. independence from the authors and their institutions, ability to evaluate the technical aspects of the paper fully and fairly, currently or recently assessing related submissions. My paper has been in that state for over a month, but the editor let us know it was going out for peer review. All Rights Reserved.
sciencenature - In light of their advice, I am delighted to say that we can in principle offer to publish it in Nature, provided that you revise the paper to address a number of further editorial points. The journal editor will probably make their final decision about your paper based on the changes you now make to the work, as well as the contents, its originality, and the way you write your cover letter. The SEC pay-to-play rule for investment advisers as it turns 12 How do I align things in the following tabular environment? Peer review comments, cover letter and more. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. If rejection follows a long review process, it can be especially disappointing. response letterresubmit, 3. A vital, and often overlooked, aspect of peer review is that in the current system, peer reviewers are normally not paid for their work. I love to write and share science related Stuff Here on my Website. Natureuses a transparent peer review system, where for manuscripts submitted from February 2020 we can publish the reviewer comments to the authors and author rebuttal letters of published original research articles. It's true that editorial rejections can be very rapid based on scope and perceived 'gee whiz' factor. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. Production The action you just performed triggered the security solution. Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . Is there a single-word adjective for "having exceptionally strong moral principles"? The manuscript subject falls outside of the Aims and Scope of the selected journal or is not likely to be of interest to the readership of the selected journal. //-->
Is Skillage An African Bum Disease,
Psychologist Wellington Adhd,
Millfield Theatre Cinderella,
Famous Right Wing Celebrities Uk,
Homes For Rent By Owner In Racine, Wi,
Articles E